tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18423760.post2069285837877118735..comments2008-12-23T14:07:26.589-06:00Ty Willihnganznoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18423760.post-34930381906825539922008-12-23T14:07:00.000-06:002008-12-23T14:07:00.000-06:00Too bad we're still a year and a half away from being able to use him and Gadzuric as expirings. But man, that's $25 million all together, plus another $15 from Jefferson. <BR/><BR/>If Skiles can stack successes like McCarthy talks about, for another 18 months, and Hammond can maybe make a couple smart if not huge moves in the meantime, their job could get a lot easier.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18423760.post-58054437812814053532008-12-23T10:07:00.000-06:002008-12-23T10:07:00.000-06:00I agree entirely with your comments and have felt this way ever since we signed Redd to that max deal back in 2005. <BR/><BR/>What you've added to the debate is your statistical showing that Redd right now isn't bringing much value and he plays the most easily replaced spot (SG) on the court. Just think about having $12 million more of money to use on other players if we had John Salmons and his $5 million dollar salary instead of Redd right now. <BR/><BR/>I think he's untradeable unless we take back a bad contract in return. <BR/><BR/>The real story may be his decline in play under the Skiles system. Stotts and Larry K. set up the offense so that we had all our bigs setting screens for Redd to shoot from. And our rebounding and defense suffered greatly because of it. <BR/><BR/>Now Skiles has abandoned the "Redd-centric" offense and thus Redd's numbers have gone way down. But our defense and rebounding have gone way up since guys like Bogut don't need to be setting screens at the three point line all night long.paulpressey25noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18423760.post-18559468580126672682008-12-22T21:12:00.000-06:002008-12-22T21:12:00.000-06:00it's a very valid point<BR/><BR/>Redd is definitely overpaid <BR/><BR/>I can't see the Bucks trading him though unless they get a nice shooting guard in next years draft (or as a free agent).<BR/><BR/>It's a shame Charlie Bell isn't playing well as he could be a great shooting guard if he wanted to be.Get Moneynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18423760.post-27106898865250178912008-12-22T21:06:00.000-06:002008-12-22T21:06:00.000-06:00Its going to be hard to trade Redd with that fat contract.<BR/><BR/>I wish, though...REDDzonenoreply@blogger.com